ANALYTICAL EXPOSITION TEXT-SHEET FOR COLLEGE STUDENTS IN READING COMPREHENSION
Abstract
The research specifically examines the analytical exposition text sheets to improve reading comprehension among third-semester English education students. By using classroom action research, the study follows a cyclic process of planning, acting, observing, and reflecting. Participants selected from a specific class undergo assessments through observation sheets, field notes, and reading comprehension tasks. The findings indicate that using analytical exposure text sheets significantly enhances students' reading comprehension, as evidenced by a notable increase in average grades. These text sheets, characterized by a clear structure for presenting arguments, logical reasoning, and supporting evidence, prove effective in fostering critical thinking skills. The success of this method underscores its potential as a valuable tool for educators, offering a structured yet flexible approach that accommodates diverse learning styles.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aprizani, Y. 2005. Language Assessment: Assessing Reading comprehension on beginning level. Islamic Kalimantan University of MAB.
Brown, H. D. 2000. Teaching By Principles. San Francisco: California
Burns, A. 2010. Doing Action Research In English Language Teaching. New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
Creswell, J. W. 2012. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Pearson Education.
Cooper, K. M., Schinske, J. N., & Tanner, K. D. 2021. Reconsidering The Share Of A Think–Pair–Share: Emerging Limitations, Alternatives, And Opportunities For Research. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 20(1), fe1.
Efron, S. E., and Ruth Ravid. 2013. Action Research in Education: A Practical Guide. The Guilford Press.
Hudri, M., & Irwandi, H. 2018. Improving students’ reading skill through Think- Pair-Share (TPS) technique. IJECA (International Journal of Education and Curriculum Application), 90-98.
Hopkins, D. 2008. A teacher’s guide to classroom research. McGraw-Hill. Kagan., Spencer and Kagan., Miguel. 2009. Kagan Cooperative Learning. Kagan Publishing.
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. 2014. The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research.
Klinger, Janette. K, et al. 2007. Teaching Reading Comprehension to Students With Learning Difficulties. The Guilford Press.
Kurjum, M., Muhid, A., & Thohir, M. 2020. Think-pair-share model as solution to develop students’ critical thinking in Islamic studies: is it effective?. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39(1), 144-155.
Lodico, M. G., Spaulding, D. T., & Voegtle, K. H. 2010. Methods in educational research: From theory to practice (Vol. 28). John Wiley & Sons.
Lyman. F. T. and McTighe, J 1988. Cueing Thinking in the Classroom: The Promise of Theory-Embedded Tools. Educational Leadership.
Mitchell, M. L., and Janina M. Jolley. 2010. Research Design Explain. Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Orilina. A, N. N. D. Capability On Understanding Grammar On The Second Semester.
Praveen M. J. and Patel. M. F. 2008. English Language Teaching Method, Tool, Techniques. Sunrise Publisher & Distributor.
Rifa’at, A. A. 2019. Improving Reading Comprehension Through Think-Pair- Share (TPS) Technique Students of STIK Siti Khadijah Palembang. ELT- Lectura, 6(1), 9-19.
Scrivener, Jim. 2011. Learning Teaching: The Essential Guide to English Language Teaching. Macmillan Education.
Singh, Y. K. 2006. Fundamental of research methodology and statistics. New Age International.
Stringer, E. T. (2007). Action Research Third Edition. America: Sage Publication Westwood, Peter. 2004. Learning and Learning Difficulties: A Handbook For Teacher. Acer Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31932/jees.v7i1.3193
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 333 timesPDF - 405 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



















