PROBLEM POSING DAN STRATEGI METAKOGNISI PESERTA DIDIK DALAM MATERI BANGUN RUANG DI SMK

Tanti Eviliana Pardede, Sugiatno Sugiatno, Dede Suratman

Abstract


ABSTRAK

Problem posing dan strategi metakognisi merupakan keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi dan sangat penting dikuasai oleh peserta didik. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan kemampuan problem posing, strategi metakognisi peserta didik, hubungan kemampuan problem posing dan strategi metakognisi peserta didik. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kombinasi sequential exploratory. Sumber data penelitian ini adalah peserta didik kelas XI Multimedia. Data berupa hasil tes uraian dan hasil wawancara semi-terstruktur. Tes uraian terdiri sebanyak tiga soal yang meminta peserta didik untuk mengajukan masalah berdasarkan indikator situasi problem posing yang telah ditetapkan pada soal. Peserta didik diminta untuk mengajukan masalah matematis bangun ruang sisi lengkung pada situasi bebas, situasi semi-terstruktur, dan situasi terstruktur. Menyelesaikan masalah matematis bangun ruang sisi lengkung mengggunakan strategi metakognisi. Setelah itu akan dilakukan wawancara semi-terstruktur terhadap tiga peserta didik untuk memperdalam data dan mengungkap lebih lanjut mengenai kemampuan problem posing dan strategi metakognisi yang tidak terlihat pada hasil tes uraian. Kemampuan peserta didik dalam mengajukan masalah lebih dominan pada situasi bebas dan semi-terstruktur. Strategi metakognisi secara signifikan mempengaruhi kinerja aktual keterampilan pengajuan masalah dan penyelesaian masalah matematis. Hasil penelitian juga menunjukkan hubungan kemampuan problem posing dan strategi metakognisi dengan Pearson Correlation sebesar 0,72 yang berarti merupakan korelasi kuat dan memiliki hubungan yang positif.

Kata Kunci: Problem Posing, Strategi Metakognisi, Bangun Ruang Sisi Lengkung


ABSTRACT

Problem-posing and metacognition strategies are high-level thinking skills and are very important to be mastered by students. This study aims to describe problem-posing abilities, students' metacognition strategies, the relationship between problem-posing abilities and students' metacognition strategies. This study uses a sequential exploratory combination method. The data sources of this research are students of class XI Multimedia. The data are in the form of description test results and semi-structured interview results. The description test consists of three questions that ask students to pose problems based on the problem-posing situation indicators set on the questions. Students are asked to pose a mathematical problem of solid geometry in free situations, semi-structured situations, and structured situations. They are solving mathematical problems of solid geometry using metacognition strategies. After that, interviews with three students will be conducted to deepen the data and reveal more about problem-posing abilities and metacognition strategies that are not seen in the results of the description test. The ability of students to pose problems is more dominant in free and semi-structured situations. Metacognition strategies significantly affect the actual performance of problem-posing and mathematical problem-solving skills. The results also show the relationship between problem-posing abilities and metacognition strategies with the Pearson Correlation of 0.72, which means it is a strong correlation and has a positive relationship.

Keywords: Problem Posing, Metacognition Strategy, Solid Geometry


Keywords


Problem Posing, Strategi Metakognisi, Bangun Ruang Sisi Lengkung

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afriansyah, E. (2017). Problem Posing Sebagai Kemampuan Matematis. Jurnal Mosharafa. 6(1): 163-180

Afrilianto et al. (2019). Improving Students’ Mathematical Problem Posing Ability Using PACE Model. Journal of Physics. Doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1315/1/012007.

Bonotto, C. (2012). Artifacts as sources for problem-posing activities. Educ Stud Math, 83: 37-55. Springer Science dan Business Media Dordrecht. Doi: 10.1007/s10649-012-9441-7

Brown. (1987). Enhancing Instructional Time Through Attention to Metacognition. Journal of Learning Dsabilities, 20(2): 66-75. doi: 10.1177/002221948702000201.

Brown, S. I., & Walter, M, I. (2005). The art of problem posing (3rd ed.) Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Cai, J., dan Hwang, S. (2016). Generalized and generative thinking in U.S. and Chinese students’ mathematical problem solving and problem posing. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21(4), 401-421.

Cai, J., John, C., Wang, N., Hwang, S., Nie, B., dan Garber, T. (2012). Mathematical problem posing as a measure of curricular effect on students’ learning. Educ Stud Math, 83: 57-69. Springer Science dan Business Media B. V. doi 10.1007/s10649-012-9429-3

Collins, J. W., & O’Brien, N. P. (2003). The greenwood dictionary of education. London: Greenwood Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches. London: Sage.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-development inquiry. American Pshycologist, 34(10), 906-911. doi:10.1037/0003-006X.34.10.906

Ghasempour, Z., Bakar M. N., dan Jahanshahloo, G. B. (2013). Mathematical problem posing and metacognition: a theoretical framework. International Journal of Pedagogical Innovations, 1, No. 2, 63-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.12785/ijpi/010201

Grotzer, T. dan Mittlefehldt, S. (2012). The role of metacognition in students’ understanding and transfer of explanatory structures in science. In A. Zohar dan Y. J. Dori (Eds.), Metakognitive in science education: Trends in current research (pp. 79-99). Dordretch: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2132-6_5

Hiller, S. E. (2017). Mastering science with metacognitive and self-regulatory strategies: A teacher-resercher dialogue of practical application for adolescent student. New York, NY: Nova.

Jonassen, D. H. (2011). Learning to solve problems: A Handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments. New York, NY: Routledge.

Juanti, dkk. (2021). Analisis Kesulitan dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Geometri Pokok Bahasan Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif. doi: 10.22460/jpmi.v4i2.239-248.

Lehman, J., Goussios, C., & Seufert, T. (2016). Working memory capacity and disfluency effect: An aptitude-treatment- interaction study. Metacognition Learning, 11(1), 89-105. doi: 10.1007/s11409-015-9149-z

Nardon, C. F., & Lee R. G. (2010). Critical inquiry across the disciplines: Strategy student-generated problem posing. College Teaching, 59(1), 13-22. doi: 10.1080/87567555.2010.489077

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA. Author.

Schoenfeld. (2016). Learning to Think Mathematically: Problem Solving, Metacognition, and Sense Making in Mathematics. Journal of Education, 196(2), 1-38

Shadiq, F. (2013). Metakognisi: Apa dan Mengapa Penting? PPPPTK Matematika. http://p4tkmatematika.kemendikbud.go.id

Stickles, P. R. (2011). An analysis of secondary and middle school teachers’ mathematical problem posing. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 3(2), 1-34. doi:10.1080/24727466.2011.11790301

Taber, K. S. (2012). Modelling Learners and learning in science education: Developing representation of concepts, conceptual structure and conceptual change to inform and research. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7648-7

Toit & Kotze. (2009). Metacognitive Strategies in the Teaching and Learning Mathematics. Faculty of Education, University of the Free State. Pythagoras, 70, 57-67

Wilson, D., dan Conyers, M. (2016). Teaching students to drive their brains: Metacognitive strategies, aactivites, and lesson ideas. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Yudianto, E., Nindya, Y. S., & Setiawan, T. B. (2021). Kecemasan Geometri Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar Ditinjau dari Teori Van Hiele. Jurnal Cendikia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. 05(02), 1102-1115




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31932/ve.v12i2.1386

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 329 times
PDF - 182 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 VOX EDUKASI: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.