THE IMPLICATION OF READING TECHNIQUE USE AND SELF-BELIEF TO READING COMPREHENSION IN UNIVERSITY
Abstract
Abstract: The research’s purpose is to perceive the implication of reading technique use and self-belief  to reading comprehension. This research is conducted to answer the problem do reading technique and self-belief fundamentally implication to college students’ reading comprehension. The problem was answered using alternative hypothesis stating reading technique and self-belief significantly implicate to college students’ reading comprehension. The reasearch used quantitative and research design is correlation. The subject of the reserach was 240 population students of English Education Department of Universitas Islam Madura Pamekasan. The sample was 150 students after being counted by Sloven theory. The sample was taken using simple random sampling with lottery media. The data was taken using questionnaire for reading technique which consisted of 30 points questions to know the frequency of reading technique use, questiannaire for self-belief which consisted of 9 questions for regulated learning and the answers scored using Likert Scale, the reading comprehension test consisted 40 questions were picked up from Longman Pre TOEFL reading test. The data were analyzed using regression formula to answer the reserach problem. Data analysis was counted using SPSS version 11.0. The result showed that reading technique and self-belief fundamentally implicate to the college students’ reading comprehension. It was authenticated by table of regression showing that the value of F is 14.339 (p<0.01). It meant that the data reject nul hypothesis and receive alternative hypothesis. It is substantiated reading technique and self-belief fundamentally to reading comprehension of students university.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
REFERNCES
Alfassi, M. 2004. Reading to learn: Effects of Combined Strategy Instruction on High School Students. Journal of Educational Research, 97 (4), 171-184.
Bandura, A. 1994. Encyclopedia of Human Behavior (Vol. 4). Academic Press.
Barnett, M.A. 1989. More than Meets the Eye. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents
Caverly, D. C., & Orlando, V. P. 1991. Textbook Study Strategies. In R. F. Flippo & D. C. Caverly (Eds.). Teaching Reading and Study Strategies at the College Level (pp. 86-165). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Cheng, C. K. 2000. The Relationship between Four Metacognitive Factors and Reading Ability. Proceedings of the 17 th International Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China (ROC-TEFL), Soochow University, 277-293.
Huang, S. C. 2001. Designing English Learning Strategy Training Activities. English Teaching & Learning, 26 (2), 45-62.
Kem, J. W. 1989. Promoting Active Reading Comprehension Strategies: A Resource Book for Teachers. N.J.: Englewood Cliffs.
Ko, E.. 2002. Interactions 2: Reading. New York, NY
Latief, M. 2018. Teori manajemen Pendidikan. Kencana: Jakarta
Lau, K. L. 2006. Implementing Strategy Instruction in Chinese Language Classes: A School-Based Chinese Reading Strategy Instruction Program. Educational Research, 48 (2), 195-209.
Miller, L. D., & Perkins, K. 1989. ESL Reading Comprehension Institution. ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED303779.
O’Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Kupper, L., & Russo, R. P. 1985. Learning Strategies Used by Beginning and Intermediate ESL Students. Language Learning, 35 (1), 21-46.
Salomon, G. 1984. Television is easy and print is tough: the different: The different investment of mental efort in learning as a function of perceptions and attributions. Journal of Education Psychology, 76(647), 658
Shang, F. H. 2010. Reading Strategy Use, Self-Efficacy, and Reading Comprehension. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly June 2010 Volume 12, Issue 2.
Winstead, L. 2004. Increasing academic motivation and cognition in reading, Writing, and Mathematics: Meaning-Making Strategies. Educational Research Quarterly, 28 (2), 30-49.
Wong, M. S. 2005. Language Learning Strategies and Language Self-Efficacy. Regional Language Centre Journal, 36 (3), 245-269.
Yang, L. L. 2004. The Development of AValidated Perceived Self-Efficacy Scale on English Reading Strategies. Journal of Education & Psychology, 27 (2), 377-398.
Zhang, Z. 1993. Literature Review on Reading Strategy Research. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Biloxi, Mississippi, USA.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31932/jees.v4i1.887
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 5301 timesPDF - 366 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


















